Can somebody please explain this to me?!?!?!?
This is the stuff that pisses me off!
I will try to get this out in a clear, concise manner.
In 1988 Sean Deacon had been convicted for 5 counts of sexual assault and one count of abduction.
1 x 5 year old girl
1 x 6 year old boy
1 x 8 year old boy
1 x 13 year old boy
1 x sexual assault.

Once convicted (but before the sentence of 7 years) he abducted and again assaulted the 13 year old boy again.
1 x 13 year old boy
for a total of:
5 assaults on children + 1 abduction = "7" years (about 5 years in Canadian).

In 1993 he was released, by 1994 he was back in jail for violating his terms, I don't know what the terms were that he violated but it must have been a lot more then breaking curfew to be remanded.

1996, he was convicted on sexual interference with a 5 year old boy and receieved 2 years less a day (which I believe is to stay in provincial as opposed to federal prison but I will try to comfirm).
1998, while on probation he plead guilty to two counts of assault and one count of sexual interference by touching for a sexual purpose involving an 11-year-old boy.
3 weeks after being released on the last charges he was found in the company of a 10 year old boy (at the halfway house he had been sent to in Vancouver), no assaults were charged so I will give the benefit of the doubt that he was 'only' breaking one of his conditions, and was sentenced to 2 years in jail.
Ok, so let's recap

Sexual Assaults that he was caught/convicted for:
1 x 5 year old girl
1 x 6 year old boy
1 x 8 year old boy
1 x 13 year old boy
1 x 13 year old boy
1 x sexual assault
1 x sexual 'interefrence' 5 year old boy
1 x sexual touching 11 year old boy

Abductions he was caught/convicted for:
1 x abduction
1 x abduction 13 yr old boy

So, this sounds like a dangerous offender right? Wrong!
This pedophile was recently released into a halfway house in Kelowna BC, while there he fought to remove the supervision conditions on his bail, as well as arguing against taking drugs to limit his "sex" drive. He lost.
He then went back to jail for 2 months for another bail violation.
After that? He was released to Vancouver, to the same facility where he was found in the company of the 10 year old boy in 1998.

5 bail breaches in under 2 years
+
10 or more charges for sexually abusing kids
=
Being released and having the taxpayers foot the bill so he can be monitered 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year until his supervision order expires in 2013, when I fear that he will once again become a free "person" if you can call him that.
I think that while this supervision is supposed to protect the public, all it amounts to is private security for this bastard.
Now I don't know if this post will make much sense so I provided a link to the story at the top of my rant.
There is a law in Canada that allows Dangerous Offenders to be locked up indefinately
If this individual doesn't qualify, who the hell does???